1981 Abarth A 112 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 1295 kg more than 1981 Abarth A 112.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Abarth A 112 | 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | A 112 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2810 mm |