1981 Abarth A 112 vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1981 Abarth A 112.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Abarth A 112 | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2730 mm |