1981 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M3 weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1981 Abarth A 112.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Abarth A 112 | 2009 BMW M3 | |
Make | Abarth | BMW |
Model | A 112 | M3 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2770 mm |