1981 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 576 kg more than 1981 Abarth A 112.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Abarth A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1981 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1981 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | A 112 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 264 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2860 mm |