1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 (104 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 weights approximately 740 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 (206 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Subaru |
Model | Alfa 6 | R2 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 30 L |