1981 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Alfa Romeo GTV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Alfa Romeo GTV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 706 kg more than 1981 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1981 Alfa Romeo GTV has manual transmission. 1981 Alfa Romeo GTV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | GTV | CTS |
Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1768 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1442 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2880 mm |