1981 Alpina B 10 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Alpina B 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Alpina B 10 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Alpina B 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 366 kg more than 1981 Alpina B 10.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Alpina B 10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Alpina B 10 (469 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (330 Nm). This means 1981 Alpina B 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Alpina B 10 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Alpina | Mazda |
Model | B 10 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 330 Nm |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 158 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 5080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3010 mm |