1981 Alpina B6 vs. 2005 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2005 Ford Taurus is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Taurus weights approximately 3 kg more than 1981 Alpina B6.
Because 1981 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Alpina B6 | 2005 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Alpina | Ford |
| Model | B6 | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1272 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |
