1981 Audi 100 vs. 2002 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2002 Mahindra CL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi 100 (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra CL weights approximately 190 kg more than 1981 Audi 100.
Because 2002 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi 100 | 2002 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Audi | Mahindra |
Model | 100 | CL |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2040 mm |