1981 Audi 100 vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1981 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 100.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 100. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1981 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1981 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi 100 | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Audi | SsangYong |
| Model | 100 | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
