1981 Audi 100 vs. 2008 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2008 Mazda B2300 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda B2300 (144 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1981 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 100.
Because 2008 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi 100 | 2008 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | 100 | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2266 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 144 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 62 L |
