1981 Audi 80 vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1981 Audi 80 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1981 Audi 80. (136 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1981 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Audi 80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi 80 | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Audi | Lincoln |
| Model | 80 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 136 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3210 mm |
