1981 Audi 80 vs. 1967 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1981 Audi 80 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi 80 (136 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Audi 80 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1967 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Audi 80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi 80 (176 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1981 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi 80 | 1967 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | 80 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |