1981 Audi 80 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1981 Audi 80 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,272 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Audi 80 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi 80 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | 80 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1272 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2010 mm |
