1981 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1981 Audi 80. (136 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 410 kg more than 1981 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (232 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 80. (176 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi 80 | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Orlando |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |