1981 Audi UR vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1981 Audi UR is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1981 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi UR | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | UR | 62 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
