1981 Audi UR vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Audi UR is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Audi UR weights approximately 80 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (285 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Audi | Triumph |
Model | UR | 2000 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |