1981 Audi UR vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1981 Audi UR is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1981 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 870 kg more than 1981 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi UR | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | UR | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
