1981 Audi UR vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1981 Audi UR is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1981 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Audi UR weights approximately 164 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (270 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | UR | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 125 L |