1981 Audi UR vs. 1968 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1981 Audi UR is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1981 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 930 kg more than 1981 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi UR | 1968 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | UR | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
