1981 Audi UR vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 1981 Audi UR is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1981 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 150 kg more than 1981 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Jaguar E Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | UR | E Type |
Year Released | 1981 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |