1981 Audi UR vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1981 Audi UR is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Audi UR weights approximately 430 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | UR | Elan |
Year Released | 1981 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 59 L |