1981 Audi UR vs. 1980 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1981 Audi UR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1980 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Falcon weights approximately 120 kg more than 1981 Audi UR.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (285 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 1980 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | UR | Falcon |
Year Released | 1981 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |