1981 Audi UR vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1981 Audi UR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Audi UR weights approximately 440 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi UR | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | UR | Colt |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2310 mm |
