1981 Audi UR vs. 1982 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 700 kg more than 1981 Audi UR.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi UR | 1982 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | UR | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5031 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3090 mm |
