1981 Audi UR vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi UR. (285 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | UR | Camaro |
Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 94.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 88.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |