1981 Audi UR vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Audi UR weights approximately 146 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi UR | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | UR | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
