1981 Audi UR vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 350 kg more than 1981 Audi UR.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Sentia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1981 Audi UR has manual transmission. 1981 Audi UR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | UR | Sentia |
Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |