1981 Audi UR vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 545 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi UR. (270 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi UR | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | UR | HRT |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
