1981 Audi UR vs. 2000 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2000 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Audi | Mahindra |
Model | UR | CL |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2040 mm |