1981 Audi UR vs. 2001 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2001 SsangYong Musso is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2001 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2001 SsangYong Musso. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2001 SsangYong Musso.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 SsangYong Musso (318 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi UR. (285 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2001 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | UR | Musso |
Year Released | 1981 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |