1981 Audi UR vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1981 Audi UR.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (285 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 1981 Audi UR has manual transmission. 1981 Audi UR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | UR | F1 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |