1981 Audi UR vs. 2003 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1981 Audi UR.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1981 Audi UR has manual transmission. 1981 Audi UR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2003 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | UR | Escalade |
Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2960 mm |