1981 Audi UR vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2004 MG ZT. (158 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT weights approximately 235 kg more than 1981 Audi UR.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MG ZT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (285 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZT. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2004 MG ZT | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | UR | ZT |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2760 mm |