1981 Audi UR vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,360 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Camry. (154 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (285 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Camry. (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | UR | Camry |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2360 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 88.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |