1981 Audi UR vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1981 Audi UR. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi UR.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi UR. (285 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi UR. 2007 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1981 Audi UR has manual transmission. 1981 Audi UR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | UR | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2880 mm |