1981 Audi UR vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 110 kg more than 1981 Audi UR.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Toyota Condor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (285 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | UR | Condor |
Year Released | 1981 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1812 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |