1981 Audi UR vs. 2009 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2009 Ford Fusion. (158 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Because 1981 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Fusion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (285 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Audi UR | 2009 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | UR | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
