1981 Audi UR vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Audi UR (285 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1981 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | UR | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |