1981 Audi UR vs. 2012 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2012 Toyota Highlander is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Highlander (280 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1981 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 910 kg more than 1981 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2012 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | UR | Highlander |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4796 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |