1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1964 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1981 Austin Allegro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Austin Allegro weights approximately 145 kg more than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 1964 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 1964 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Allegro | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1981 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2110 mm |