1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1981 Austin Allegro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1265 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Allegro | Sixty |
Year Released | 1981 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3390 mm |