1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1969 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1981 Austin Allegro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1981 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1305 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Austin Allegro | 1969 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Allegro | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 2105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3300 mm |
