1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1969 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1981 Austin Allegro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,544 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1357 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 1969 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 1981 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1981 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 1969 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Austin | Lincoln |
Model | Allegro | Continental |
Year Released | 1981 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 7544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 365 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2207 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2980 mm |