1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1977 Chrysler 1610
To start off, 1981 Austin Allegro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler 1610. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler 1610 would be higher. At 1,981 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Chrysler 1610 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Chrysler 1610 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 1977 Chrysler 1610 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chrysler 1610. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 1977 Chrysler 1610 | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Allegro | 1610 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |