1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1980 Chrysler Cordoba
To start off, 1981 Austin Allegro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Chrysler Cordoba is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler Cordoba. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chrysler Cordoba has automatic transmission and 1981 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1981 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chrysler Cordoba will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 1980 Chrysler Cordoba | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Allegro | Cordoba |
Year Released | 1981 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2880 mm |