1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 1982 Zastava 132 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 132 weights approximately 248 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 1982 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | Allegro | 132 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1098 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |