1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1981 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Allegro | FTO |
Year Released | 1981 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |