1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1995 BMW 520
To start off, 1995 BMW 520 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW 520 weights approximately 638 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 1995 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Austin Allegro | 1995 BMW 520 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | Allegro | 520 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
