1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2000 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2000 Dodge Ram is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Ram weights approximately 640 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 2000 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Allegro | Ram |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 468 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 6200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3940 mm |